IABC launches "SR LINK"

It would appear that my previous post on the language of CR and sustainability was very serendipitous in its timing.

Right on cue, the International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) has launched a new blog covering this area of practice, complete with its own particular take on the terminology of choice to describe it: Social Responsibility, or SR. (As if the waters could be muddied any further!)

According to their logic, it’s the “C” of “CSR” that’s the problem (more so than the “S”), in that it suggests an exclusive focus on corporations, rather than including the remit of governments, NGOs and other non-business enterprises.

I can see the point although, frankly, it is business that has by far the biggest role to play. It’s business that’s the engine of growth and it’s business that will scupper us if we don’t start doing it more sustainably. Even if you accept the point, the issues already highlighted with “social responsibility” mean it’s probably just further evidence in support of the case for “sustainability”.

By now, I imagine your patience is probably wearing thin with all this terminology guff. However, if you can bear it, it’s worth checking out the comments thread on this particular topic (complete with a couple of further contributions to the debate from yours truly).

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “IABC launches "SR LINK"

  1. Ashwani

    A phenomenon that has preceded the coining of the term ‘CSR’, the link between the ‘karma’ as espoused by sacred Indian texts and initiatives anchoring corporates as responsible citizens has been amply evident in India since the early days.

    Like

    Reply
  2. commscrum

    Terminology is important: with our worlds, we create our world.

    Consequently, it’s surreal for a group claiming to speak for “business communicators” drops the “corporate” from “corporate social responsibility”, particularly when the prevailing trend is to drop the “social”.

    For what it’s worth, terminology chosen can be as important as acts undertaken–particularly if the terminology either invites–or suppresses–additional participation.

    All the best,

    Mike Klein–The Intersection
    http://intersectionblog.wordpress.com

    Like

    Reply
  3. commscrum

    CORRECTED:

    Terminology is important: with our words, we create our world.

    Consequently, it’s surreal for a group claiming to speak for “business communicators” drops the “corporate” from “corporate social responsibility”, particularly when the prevailing trend is to drop the “social”.

    For what it’s worth, terminology chosen can be as important as acts undertaken–particularly if the terminology either invites–or suppresses–additional participation.

    All the best,

    Mike Klein–The Intersection
    http://intersectionblog.wordpress.com

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s